Community health is one of the most important and under-discussed aspects of health in the US.  That's why I have taken on the project of summarizing and commenting on Robert Nisbet's classic work: The Quest for Community, one of the best books on community ever written.  

You can scroll through my blog for the other chapters to catch up, as I'm going chapter by chapter.  If you like what I'm doing here on the blog, pass it along or invite me to speak.  I do conferences and seminars on a variety of health topics - fitness, nutrition, and wellness.  

​Read on and enjoy.  At the end of this series I'm going to put together a guide to improving community health.  

---------

Recent protests, riots, violence, censorship, and brazen cases of propaganda and disinformation have made this essay as pertinent as anything I've ever written.   In truth, riots and protests have been going on the last few years, though the media hasn't been covering it. If they have, they have been misleading the public as to what's really happening.  

To put it very simply: The reason extremism seems to be on the rise is because of the collapse of community in the United States.  

Real community is family, extended family, extended kin, churches, associations, local neighborhoods, and fraternal organizations.  These have all collapsed in America.  Things have been going this way for many years now, but it seems to be getting worse.  But the truth is that all of this could get much, much worse.

It's important to know what's really happening.  Chapter 8, entitled "The Total Community" of Robert Nisbet's "The Quest for Community" addresses exactly what the problem is.  The "Total Community" is mass society of atomized individuals, characterized by a soft or hard totalitarianism that seeps its way into human consciousness and wars against both culture and real community.  The "Total Community" is not a phenomena of culture war, but rather a "war against culture." A great example of this is the currently lauded 1619 project, which pushes the false narrative that the USA was evil from the beginning, and is backed by the media power centers in the US, New York, Hollywood, and academia.  

Local community is virtually non-existent in the USA, and so being proud to be part of a larger national community was something many people could participate in.  In other words, it was good to be American and be patriotic.  The 1619 project, which could be seen as a prototype arm of the "Total Community" seeks to destroy what little goodwill is left in this form of national community and to make people be ashamed of their own nation.  Amazingly, Nisbet describes this type of thing perfectly in the "Total Community."  

​The Total Community
 
In this long study of community health I think it’s helpful to take a step back.  Let’s look at the big picture.  America seems to be falling apart, fragmenting along partisan lines.  Depression and anxiety are at epidemic levels and what sociologists call “deaths of despair” have seen a sharp rise.  The leadership class is not a failure, it's either a laughingstock or non-existent.  Let’s cut to the chase.  The problem we’re dealing with is social isolation, atomization, and social fragmentation, and the continued breakdown of what’s left of our shared American culture.  
 
What is the cause?  As we’ve learned, it’s inherent in the “progressive” and historical consciousness which has become dominant in our country.  The growth of the state has pushed aside real forms of community.  In place of real community, a soft totalitarianism grows into what Nisbet calls the “Total Community.  This massive “relearning” and displacement come at the cost of social membership, social status, social belonging, in other words it has come at the cost of community health.  The “Total Community”, the direction we are quickly heading towards, is the totalitarian community because of its dominant and destructive effect on all other forms of belonging. 
 
It is mass society, which is large numbers of people separated from each other, except in mass movements for “hope” or “change” or “diversity” or other amorphous quasi-religious political groups or movements.  Most people are not aware that they are part of this mass total society, that they are being manipulated, cajoled, influenced, and marginalized into an isolated social world, but they are.  
 
So our goal in this series of essays has been to deconstruct the problem of this growing “Total Community”,  which is a type of anti-community and figure out how we can improve real community health in opposition.  The most important reason we have to do this is because the “Total Community” is also a totalitarian community, it destroys people.   
 
Alexis de Toqueville was a French political philosopher who visited America in the 1840s. Remarkably, he had this to say about the future in the democratic US.  This is one of the most amazing passages I’ve ever been privileged to read, because it describes our anti-community in 2020.  
 
Alexis De Toqueville on the coming “Total Community” in 1840
 
“I think that the species of oppression by which democratic nations are menaced is unlike anything that ever before existed in the world; our contemporaries will find no prototype of it in their memories. I seek in vain for an expression that will accurately convey the whole of the idea I have formed of it; the old words despotism and tyranny are inappropriate: the thing itself is new, and, since I cannot name it, I must attempt to define it. I seek to trace the novel features under which despotism may appear in the world.” 
 
“The first thing that strikes the observation is an innumerable multitude of men, all equal and alike, incessantly endeavoring to procure the petty and paltry pleasures with which they glut their lives. Each of them, living apart, is as a stranger to the fate of all the rest; his children and his private friends constitute to him the whole of mankind. As for the rest of his fellow citizens, he is close to them, but he does not see them; he touches them, but he does not feel them; he exists only in himself and for himself alone; and if his kindred still remain to him, he may be said at any rate to have lost his country. Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications.”
 
“That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in a perpetual state of childhood: it is well content that people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?” 
 
“Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things; it has predisposed men to endure them as benefits. After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small, complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd.”
 
“The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals of which the government is the shepherd. “I have always thought that servitude of the regular, quiet, and gentle kind which I have just described might be combined more easily than is commonly believed with some of the outward forms of freedom, and that it might even establish itself under the wing of the sovereignty of the people.1 
 
Robert Nisbet, in “The Quest for Community” comments on this passage;
 
Here, in these paragraphs, lies one of the most astonishing prophecies to be found anywhere in political literature. It is nothing less than a picture, nearly a century in advance of the reality, of the totalitarian community. But it is more than a mere prophecy. It is an analysis of the nature of totalitarianism that has not been improved upon by even the most brilliant of contemporary students of the subject. 
 
What makes Tocqueville's analysis immeasurably superior to all but a few others is that it does not seize upon the transparently horrible, the grotesque, the obviously irrational, as the essence of totalitarianism. It does not limit itself to brutalities which, however abhorrent and real in totalitarian society, are nevertheless practiced by totalitarian rulers only against minorities already disliked and discriminated against by majorities. 
 
It does not fix upon aspects that are but incidental or variable in the structure of totalitarianism. The merit of Tocqueville's analysis is that it points directly to the heart of totalitarianism—the masses; the vast aggregates who are never tortured, flogged, or imprisoned, or humiliated; who instead are cajoled, flattered, stimulated by the rulers; but who are nonetheless relentlessly destroyed as human beings, ground down into mere shells of humanity. And the genius of his analysis lies in the view of totalitarianism as something not historically “abnormal” but as closely related to the very trends hailed as progressive in the nineteenth century.
 
-Nisbet, Robert. The Quest for Community . Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). Kindle Edition.
 
What Conditions Create the “Total Community”?
 
When a person is socially isolated, they are vulnerable for a move towards the total community.  This is because they have no sense of status or belonging, and human beings can’t live in isolation.  When I say status I am referring to the social role, not in a hierarchical sense, or material status, but in the sense of a part to play.  For example, a church member has status as a member of the congregation.  Modern mass society isolates people, and the state pushes out competitors for community, which leaves people left to only have the “Total Community” to cling to.  We covered this progressive historical development in previous essays.    According to Nisbet:
 
“What is decisive is the social context, the sensations of disinheritance and exclusion from rightful membership in a social and moral order. These may or may not accompany poverty.”
 
-Nisbet, Robert. The Quest for Community . Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). Kindle Edition.
 
Is the “Total Community” Evil?
 
Yes and No. The “Total Community” is evil because it creates its own morality, its own existence and worldview, and has no place in history.  It does what it pleases with no regard for distinctions and for subsidiarity (smaller groups of community).  All of the past, as a matter of fact, is necessarily seen as evil and an impediment to the “Total Community.”  Because a past indicates a historical community, which is a competitor, or can pass judgement, the “total community” opposes the past by default.  The “total community” is also evil because it’s only value is the power of the strong over the weak.  The weak must be “made to be free.” 
 
Is the “Total Community” Irrational?
 
It may be evil, but the “Total Community” is not irrational, on the contrary it is completely rational:
 
The total State is rational in that it recognizes in human personality certain basic needs for security and recognition and strives through every art and technique to satisfy those needs in calculated political terms. It is rational in that it seeks to eliminate from culture all of those ceremonial, ritualistic, or symbolic features inherited from the past that constitute by their existence obstructions to the achievement of a perfect mobilization of popular will. New ceremonies and symbols will be created by totalitarian rulers, but these will be made to fit as closely into the total design of political power as manipulative intelligence can contrive.
 
-Nisbet, Robert. The Quest for Community . Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). Kindle Edition.
 
A simple way of explaining how rationalism works in the “Total Community” can be seen with these two examples with nuclear weapons:

• We have these nuclear weapons, and we can defeat our enemy with them.  Therefore we should use these nuclear weapons.  
• Nuclear weapons are the most powerful weapons on earth.  We should therefore have as many as possible.

 
This is the rationalist way of thinking, and that can be extrapolated to other areas as well, especially in the sciences. We can do this- X, Y, or Z, therefore we should. It is only rational.  
 
Individualism in the Total Community 
 
One reason individuality is so loathed under the “Total Community” is because individualism develops only in the context of social relationships, which the “Total Community” abhors.  Mass society requires isolated automatons, not individuals in real social communities.  The “Total Community” is the abstract mass society so it has no place for individualism.  If someone belongs to a strong religious group, strong family and extended kin, and has a strong sense of localism, if they are someone with membership and status, then they are not susceptible to mass movements and totalitarianism. They have no need for the “Total Community”.  The individual must be separated from all other forms of belonging, before he can belong to the “Total Community.”
 
The Past and Total Community
 
It seems like every day, a street is being renamed, a statue toppled, a building burned to the ground, a new word not allowed, another name erased from the history books.  This is the new normal in the “Total Community.”  This is because a sense of the past is a bulwark of strength to fight against totalitarianism.  The past is a form of historical community which competes, therefore it must be obliterated.  
 
This is one of the most powerful passages in the book:
 
“A sense of the past is far more basic to the maintenance of freedom than hope for the future. The former is concrete and real; the latter is necessarily amorphous and more easily guided by those who can manipulate human actions and beliefs. Hence the relentless effort by totalitarian governments to destroy memory.”
 
-Nisbet, Robert. The Quest for Community . Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). Kindle Edition.
 
The Total Community’s Totality is Death.  
 
The “Total Community”, having obliterated all other forms of real community, stands alone.  It creates its own history, its own symbols, its own language, its own vocabulary.  It doesn’t crush physically the will of the former persons, it rather bends it, softens it, and corrodes it slowly from within.  New meanings are created, even new memories.  New conceptions of good and evil, new science, new art, new history, all placed in a different “context.” 
 
This is because totalitarian power is unsustainable unless the “Total Community” is supreme in every facet.  It must create true believers.  It can’t kill everyone or there won’t be anyone left.  So it uses softer means, especially in 2020.  Even in the religious and spiritual sphere the totality is clothed in the garments of deep belief.  Eventually human consciousness is reshaped and remade.  Human agency is lost.  The powerful control even the thoughts of the weak before they happen.  It has happened before, and it will happen again if we let it.  Real community is different, it brings agency, independence, and freedom.  It is based on limits and belonging, on membership not on mass atomized society.  Real community is the only bulwark against nihilism and death.  
 
“This is the true horror of totalitarianism. The absolute political community, centralized and omnicompetent, founded upon the atomized masses, must ceaselessly destroy all those autonomies and immunities that are in normal society the indispensable sources of the capacity for freedom and organization. Total political centralization can lead only to social and cultural death.”
 
Nisbet, Robert. The Quest for Community . Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). Kindle Edition.
 
 ---

This is a tough topic, but one worth learning about, if you want to live a healthy life.

I write about 3 things:

Fitness- What we do, how we train, etc.
Nutrition- What and how we eat.
Wellness- Lifestyle, culture, and everything else.  

And remember...there's never been a better day than TODAY to make it happen!
 
Read Next: Speed and Power Training Simplified​
 
Want to sign up for email newsletter? Sign up on my home page:
www.scottgodwin.net
 
If you like the blog, please share it with friends or on social media.

​Chapter 7: The Political Community
 
What we’ve see unfold here in Nisbet’s classic work, the Quest for Community, is a gradual decline in community as the state (the modern bureaucratic government) has grown in power.  The two feed on each other in a symbiotic relationship.  The state grows and community declines.  As the state steps in as “mother” and “father”, actual mothers and fathers recede in importance or increasingly in many cases cease to exist at all.  What is left is not the organic, local, natural, historical community, but rather the abstract and ideological “political community” which has pushed neighborhood, village, parish church, trade guild, family, extended family, and fraternal and civic clubs aside.  
 
In recent years, this is an obvious historical fact on display loudly in many ways. For example, many Americans are rabidly interested in national elections or some amorphous global political agenda with messianic fervor but don’t know who the mayor of their own town is, or who their neighbors are, and more Americans than ever live alone and struggle with mental illness.  People are willing to literally kill each other over who becomes president of our declining Republic, or over the death of a drug dealer 1000s of miles away, but pass countless nameless homeless people lying around in ditches literally in their own neighborhoods and will never lift a finger to help them, and have no idea who is on their own city council.   This is the modern world.  Modern people are ironically both extremely connected to fake community online, and extremely isolated from real community in their daily lives.  This is the irony of modern life:
 
Extreme ideological and virtual anti-community masquerading as real community while real community continues to decline.  
 
Nisbet’s work tracks how this came to be.  As we have tracked along and summarized from this book, this loss of community has been a very slow but gradual process.  Life has become an abstraction, and real community has suffered many setbacks, while political quasi-community on a global scale seems to be all that’s left.  
 
In Chapter 7, Nisbet remarks that the totalitarian movements of the 20th Century, mainly in Europe but other places as well, were a logical outcome of the growth of the “political community” and the loss of other grounded and historical communities.  To Rousseau’s thinking, which has become dominant, only the state can secure this new status of anti-community. Status was historically a sense of belonging to something larger than oneself- a religious communion, mother, father, citizen, etc.  Status in the modern world has no real meaning outside of consumerism- brand names.
 
The Irony of Modern “Community”
 
The modern community, as exemplified by the political community Nisbet writes about, is ironically an anti-community.  It is a community of rootless people committed to work against real community.  So in that sense, in an odd twist of fate, those committed to oppose community have formed a community.   This is what Nisbet call the “political community.”  Those who are committed to oppose real community are relying on the state’s power to ensure no real community.  So then, to be clear, the conundrum is this:
 
The modern state, the modern government, is opposed to and actively works against community.
 
What is the modern Political Community?
 
“The political community in this regard is the belief that the normal plurality of authorities and functions in society (church, family, village, guild, club, etc.) must be supplanted by a unity of authority and function arising from the monistic state.” 
 
– Robert Nisbet, The Quest for Community
 
The Characteristics of the Modern Political Community (which is really an anti-community)

• The political community is freedom from other institutions and equals participation in the Leviathan- the all- encompassing, omnipotent, omnipresent state.  
• Equality is the leveling action of Leviathan, whereby opponents such as families and clans which compete for loyalty are opposed.  Equality is a euphemism for power.  
• The camouflaging of power within the rhetoric of freedom.  
  • This camouflage is the most important factor here.  The new form of political community we have, as the one created in the French Revolution was, is always sold as freedom, even if it’s tyranny.  We see this in modern times, with more and more “freedom” equaling more and more loneliness, social isolation, depression, obesity, addiction, debt, and so on- freedom to be addicted to vices which others profit from. This is tyranny masked and sold as freedom.  As mentioned in the previous chapter, the new form of “freedom” becomes a situation of the “controllers” and the “controlled.”  The famous novel “A Brave New World” by Alduous Huxley covers this.  
• Only through force could this type of “freedom” in the new political community be born.  
• The French Revolution is the historical example par excellence of the new political community, where “freedom” is sold but which ends up as tyranny.  
• A competition emerges, between the state on one hand, and the spiritual and social associations on the other.
• Totalitarian and extremist political movements emerge as a form of replacement community. 
• The psychological vacuum created by revolution and loss of authentic community leads to an increase in state power and nationalism. 
  • Leviathan has created:
    • Anarchy, so the state steps in even more to create a quasi-culture.
    • Lawlessness, so the state steps in to restore order. 
    • A spiritual vacuum and existential angst, so the state steps in to offer a political community. 
• Karl Marx touted the political community as the ultimate goal of his communist revolution, with a centralized and absolute state ruling supreme. 
• As far as authority, every man would become his own priest, lawyer, and judge and monarch.   
• There has been a repugnant historical relationship between “social justice” and nationalism and totalitarian movements. 
  • Napoleon Bonaparte’s revolution and his “Bonapartism” were a logical and rational outcome of this process, of forcing people to be “free.”

 
The Bottom Line: The Arsonist and the Fire Department
 
As a way of summing up the political community, the Leviathan, in other words, let me use a metaphor.  The modern political community is both the arsonist and the fire department.   It’s the arsonist because it’s revolutionary, it destroys the natural communities that make life healthy, happy, stable, meaningful, and most importantly provide the framework for agency, and it’s also the fire department because it steps in with bureaucratic programs, courts, law enforcement, social justice crusades, laws, welfare programs, oversight, and regulations, to fix the problems it caused in the first place.  This system feeds upon itself so much that the livelihood of countless numbers of bureaucrats, managers, and specialists depend on it not being fixed!
 
This is the absurdity of the political community.  Some of these services that the state offered, though they may have been helpful or well-meaning, ended up causing a lot of harm.  The modern political community destroys real community, and then tries to fix the problems it created by offering more in state power and growth, destroying real community even further.  Unfortunately, this leads to more chaos and eventually conflict.  That’s what we see in the news now every day.  The tragedy is that the ideology of political community started not as a means of raw state power, but ended up that way.  People really believed that utopia and paradise on earth was possible.  That was the tragic mistake, to believe heaven on earth was possible with man’s efforts alone. 
 
“The modern State and the whole ideology of the political community have become significant, influential, not through the worship of naked power but because of the promise which seemed to lie in political power for the salvation of man- for the attainment of moral goals that had eluded mankind for 1000s of years.”
 
Tragically, the quest for political community, in place of real community, took on a messianic and cultish fervor the last couple centuries.  It’s still with us.  As a result, millions have died from various ideologies like socialism, communism, and fascism.  Political community is ideology, a chosen abstraction, while real community is tangible, local, traditional, and often unchosen, the rejection of ideology and starting at home with face to face interactions.  When modern political community crowds out the other, older, prior forms of community, society suffers tremendously by breaking down, leading a vacuum for ideologies, demagogues, and totalitarianism.  

----

I write about 3 things:

Fitness- What we do, how we train, etc.
Nutrition- What and how we eat.
Wellness- Lifestyle, culture, and everything else.  

And remember...there's never been a better day than TODAY to make it happen!
 
Read Next: Intensity 
 
Want to sign up for email newsletter? Sign up on my home page:
www.scottgodwin.net
 
If you like the blog, please share it with friends or on social media.

During the quarantine I designed 3 low-impact workouts for a client / friend (she has knee issues). We took pictures and I finally got around to putting them up on my site in 3 separate PDFs. They're a gift to you, and you can do them at home for no cost, or if we get stuck inside again they're a good option. If you have knee pain or arthritis, or just want to workout without bulking up, they'd be ideal. Click on the "Free E-Books" link. There are some other good free e-books on there, and my bookstore for published books.

or CLICK HERE 

Read next: Best of the Blog

And remember...there's never been a better day than TODAY to make it happen!
 
Want to sign up for email newsletter? Sign up on my home page:
www.scottgodwin.net
 
If you like the blog, please share it with friends or on social media.
​

I took a hiatus from writing about it, but soon I'm going to start finishing up my summary of "The Quest for Community", the seminal book by Robert Nisbet on community.   

I took a couple months off to digest what I'd read so far.  It really is a groundbreaking book and I highly recommend it.  Community, even though we need it to be healthy and live a good life, is a difficult thing in modern times.

Modern life is a struggle between individualism, billed as freedom, and community, billed as repression.  Is this true? Of course not, but that is the spin we here with mainstream propaganda.

Imagine trying to ride a horse, with no skills, no direction, no training, no purpose, and no control.  Just hop on and hold on for dear life.  This is a good metaphor for pure individualism and for where we're at as a society.  Sure you're "free" as an "individual" but there is no logos, no order, to what's happening.

Pure individualism is pure will, and the problem with pure will is that it can kill you if it's not restrained.  

On the other hand, pure community could go too far the other direction and give you no freedom.  

So there has to be a balance between the two. I've been exploring the relationship between the two the last few years and it's clearer and clearer to me that:

Individualism, as such, does not exist in isolation but rather true individualism can only form and exist in community, because it is in communities in which individualism is born, grows and flourishes through:

• Cooperation- The ability to partner with others to accomplish a goal. 
• Agency- The ability to actually do things in the world.
• Roles- Your relationship to other people and what you are responsible for. 
• Character- Your character is formed in community. 

Some great examples:

• A true judo player can only form in a dojo.
• A real estate investor can only invest and make deals with a seller and other team members like lawyers and bankers.
• A father can't exist without children, or mothers, or vice versa.  Same for a brother or sister. 
• A nation can't exist without citizens.
• A business owner can't exist without customers.
• A quarterback can't exist without a receiver and a team.
• A chess player can't exist without opponents, rules, and the historical game of chess.

What Has Happened

Over time, standards of community and church morphed and changed into individual desires for self-fulfillment, personal gratification, self-actualization, and psychological development.  These desires were based on a relatively modern view about the plasticity and pliability of human nature, and the impermanence of institutions of communities (families, nations, churches, states, villages, cities, places of work and socialization).  

Though these desires for freedom at times came out of a legitimate desire to be free of oppressive forms of community, they ended up not liberating people, but rather casting people adrift in a sea of ever-shifting values based primarily on consumption.  

People over history went from standards of home and community to standards of psychology and behaviorism (scientific control of human behavior), which turned out just to be another form of control.  Science replaced community, as science was seized upon by the powerful.  The major difference is that the older communal forms of control were based on action and reason whereas the new forms of control, through marketing, advertising, and stimulus-response conditioning are based on reaction.

Once marketing, advertising, and propaganda merged with behavioral science, we all became rats in a science experiment, so to speak.  When we removed community there was no hope for the least advantaged, because community was the only stability that the poor had to find a footing in life through cooperation, agency, character, and roles.  

This is one reason the modern poor in society have such a hard time making it out of poverty.  It's less about IQ or intelligence as it is about the lack of stability in society and the lack of community pushing the disadvantaged towards an improved lot in life.  The poor are essentially treated like rats in a cage, with those at the top of society pulling the levers of stimulus and response through:

• Debt, credit cards, high-interest loans.
• Fast food and junk food.
• Slickly marketed consumer products.
• Sexual desire, limitless pornography, and dating applications.  
• Self-defeating amorphous political quests.
• Promotion of victimhood as identity, as a strategy for political control and the diminishment of agency.  

Do poor people want to suffer more from high debt, poor diets, diabetes, obesity, broken homes and families, addictions, extremist ideologies, and learned helplessness? Of course not, but this is the modern form of anti-community except for those who can break free from it, and some do.  

The theologian CS Lewis called this dichotomy decades ago the:

"Conditioners and the Conditioned"  

The powerful of society are the conditioners who use science to condition others into acting the way they want.

In this sense, one can easily see how those who are easily manipulated, and we all are from time to time, could be caught up in the rush to self-defeating "individualism" whether it's in the attempt of buying a consumer identity, getting in to debt, sexual license, food choices, or various other rejections of the stabilizing forces of community.  Ironically enough, when we reject community, we become even less able to handle the modern world.  

Sure, the wealthy conditioners can do it, because they have teams of lawyers, doctors, psychologists, maids, assistants, and entertainments to help manage the HR meetings, the complicated jargon of PC, the despair of meaninglessness, and numb the mind and spirit from a reliance solely on a scientific rationalist existence.  

It's not all negative out there.  I actually think things have gotten better in some ways, as the internet has allowed many people to break free from the matrix.
​
I really do feel like we should work hard to build culture back up, to build community back up. I think it can be done and I see positive movements all around where people are stepping out of the "matrix".  So let's press on for a more positive and constructive individualism.  

A Navy Seal writer and Podcaster I really like, Jocko Willink has a great line I like:

"If you're helping them, you're hurting them."  

I couldn't agree more.  When someone can help themselves, they should.  But community is a non-negotiable. We can't live and we can't be human without it.  

------

And remember...there's never been a better day than TODAY to make it happen!
 
Read Next: The Quest for Community- The Call to Public Health
 
Want to sign up for email newsletter? Sign up on my home page:
www.scottgodwin.net
 
If you like the blog, please share it with friends or on social media.